Charisma essentially takes on a traditional form and legitimizes its source. This could be the cultural influence of society, family, work or even education. Charismatic leadership might not stem purely out of one’s inner being, but have a social source. The second dimension is about the social aspect. But since charisma to Weber, is value-free and created by the subordinates’ assumptions, there is no detailed explanation on the origins of charisma. Weber talks about the trait being a “gift” of the leader, claiming it could be either a divine trait or a specific physical or mental state of being. There is the psychological dimension, which refers to the inner qualities of the leader. Charismatic leaders are almost savior like and people follow them as they are perceived to put things right.Ĭharismatic leadership relies on three components in Weber’s theory. He writes in the book how charisma “ knows no formal and regulated appointment or dismissal, no career, advancement, or salary, no supervisory or appeals body, no local or purely technical jurisdiction, and no permanent institutions in the manner of bureaucratic agencies”. Weber’s idea of charisma was value-free and more about the appearance of charisma rather than making specific value judgments. Therefore, the leader’s legitimacy is subjective to each subordinate.įrom the above ideas, Weber distinguished three models of legitimate leadership, summed up in the below image: Instead, Weber thought people follow a leader or a state because they evaluate the authority and perceive it good, right or just form of power. Habit – You obey simply out of the socialization of authority.Fear – You follow the rules because you don’t want the punishment.Self-interest – You obey for material or economic gain.Weber moved away from the classical thinking that authority is achieved through the three routes: The German sociologist explored the reasons people follow authority and the findings were published posthumously in 1922 in Economy and Society. The charismatic theory’s driving force is Max Weber’s study on political obligation. In terms of crafting a proper leadership theory, the two biggest influencing theories behind charismatic theory have been developed by Max Weber and Robert J. People have attributed and associated great personalities with the ability to rule in a good manner ever since the dawn of time. The idea of a strong and noble leader, who relies on personal characteristics, has been present in history. In this section, we’ll explore the idea of charismatic leadership through its past and present contexts. The idea of using one’s charisma and influence in order to lead is not a new way of looking at leadership, although the theories around it are rather recent. Charismatic people are considered as graceful and virtuous. The term charismatic comes from the ancient Greek word charis, which means grace, kindness and life. UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENT CONTEXT OF CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIPĬharisma is a trait often associated with leaders and the world is full of examples of people being described as charismatic leaders. Finally, we’ll explore the advantages and disadvantages of the style before examining a few examples of the style. We’ll also look at the core elements of charismatic leadership theory and analyze the characteristics leaders need to possess in order to be considered charismatic. But what is charismatic leadership about? In this guide, we’ll explore the theories that gave birth to this leadership style from Weber to House.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |